Higginbotham argues that the feminist
movement has embraced a “single womanhood” ignoring the fact that race, like
gender, plays a very large role in determining social and power relations. Brown states that, “all women do not have the
same gender” because race, class, time, and place all affect one’s “womaniness”. However, it is not sufficient to merely
notice that white and black women live different lives; the white woman lives
the way she does because the black woman lives her life in a certain manner,
and vice versa. That is to say, the
lives of white women are shaped by race as well. Yet, even today, “woman” is equivalent to
“white woman”. Brown compares this
assumption about “gender” to assumptions about sexuality – it is commonly assumed
that everyone is heterosexual, so one’s sexuality only merits mention if one is
gay. Likewise, it is only when the woman
is a minority that any mention of race occurs.
This is due to how minority women, especially black women have been
classified as “other” – promiscuous if not wholly barbaric and surely incapable
of ever being a “lady”.
While,
there is no doubt that differences exist between white and black women, perhaps
[white] feminists only attempted to minimize such differences in order to gain
the unity needed to build a powerful movement.
Even with such intentions assumed, Brown poignantly points out with the
example of Anita Hill that denial of these differences has come back to stymie
feminists. The feminists who rallied to
support Hill did not recognize the fact that she had “experienced sexual
harassment not as a woman who had been harassed by a man, but as a black woman
harassed by a black man.” This failure allowed Clarence Thomas, and his
supporters a monopoly on the “race card”.
They were able to demonize Hill, the victim, due to her “blackness”
because after all “black woman cannot be rapped” – for it is widely known they
are always the initiators of any sexual encounter. The ability of Thomas to frame the discussion
around such stereotypes allowed him to win the PR battle and secure his
confirmation to the Supreme Court despite the vehement opposition of feminists.
I agree
with much of what Higginbotham and Brown argue and think it would be
interesting to extend such concepts about the intersectionality of race and
gender. As Higginbotham mentioned we
know very little about how black feminist leaders thought about Black
Nationalism – there is no single “blackness” rather black women’s “womaniness”
must be separated from their “blackness”.
Very well done! I like your discussion of the ways that identities are interrelated and are formed through interaction. Your post makes me think of one vector of identity that Higginbotham overlooks -- sexuality. Higginbotham seems to assume that all blacks are heterosexual, but shouldn't sexual orientation be another form of identity that should be acknowledged, rather than subsumed under racial identity?
ReplyDelete